Zipp 808 vs TriSpoke

TJS of Minneapolis Minnesota writes about biketechreview's Zipp 808 vs Trispoke wind tunnel test on a public forum (thanks to the friends of BTR for pointing this one out!):

"I wouldn't mind the $15.00 if the test was done a little better. I feel cheated after buying it and don't recommend it for obvious (to those that have seen it) reasons. :(. "

Gotta love folks who complain about how the testing was conducted when 100% of the testing methodology was described in the publicly available, free to view blurb linked to above.

D'oh!

Despite TJS' interesting perceptions, I'm always open to feedback on what the best way to test the aerodynamic properties of wheels is (as a matter of fact, I modified the beta sweep for subsequent wind tunnel equipment tests I've conducted based on feedback from the BTR insider's list).

Anyhoo, let's hear your thoughts on how I should not "cheat" folks like TJS of Minneapolis Minnesota due to poor wind tunnel based wheel testing methodology.

I won't guarantee I'll use any of the ideas mentioned here, but I will guarantee I'll take them into consideration.